Friday, November 16, 2007

Philosophy of Mind

From Wikipedia's entry on Philosophy of Mind:

Many credit Descartes's "I think therefore I am" to be the back bone of the movie The Matrix. However, it would seem that empiricism is more akin to what the Matrix is about, i.e.,

You can be a brain in a jar somewhere and not even know it because all you an know is what you perceive through your senses.


I've been listening to Books On CD- Great courses
there is a lesson on "Agustine philosopher and saint"
it seems that the entire world view back then (roughly 340 to 400 ad)
was based alot on Plato's view of the world.

  • Things that could be imagined could be eternal

  • Things that could be sensed thru the 5 senses were mortal- subject to
    fading away, and subject to human error not to mention that your eyes
    can play tricks on you, like a mirage in the dessert.


  • Draw a pythagorian triangle on a chalk board.

    The chalk triangle is just a representation of the concept...
    it's NOT the triangle itself, it's just chalk...

    The triangle concept held in your mind is eternal, you cannot change it.
    it was a perfect triangle 2500 years ago, just because you recently
    became aware of it doesn't change it a bit.

    the one that pythagor conceptualized is the same one you conjured up
    in your mind.


    more later,
    I'll make sense of this
    (pun intended)


    ==========
    This article is for informational purposes only.
    Please contact a licensed professional in your area
    if you are in crisis or require mental health services

    Tuesday, September 12, 2006

    Some thoughts on the 12 steps

    For those who have never been around the 12 Step philosophy, here is a
    quick overview according to Ron (I knew a little but not much when I
    started my journey)...This is NOT offered as a prefect piece of writing,
    but rather some thoughts on the 12 Steps, and what I learned as I
    studied and tried to apply them.

    The 12 Steps grew out of the experiences of Dr. Bob and Bill W., the two
    original co-founders of Alcoholics Anonymous (AA). The steps are loosely
    based on another Christian program called The Oxford Group (The 12 Steps
    are NOT Christian, but the strong influences are there as is the assumption
    that one will come to believe in a Judo-Christian type “God”, although
    Higher Power is also used. The idea or confession and cleansing is common
    in many belief systems, and is the basic philosophy behind the 12 Steps.
    That is to say if we rid ourselves of resentments toward others, fears,
    and come to trust that we can live without our “Drug of Choice”,
    we can become free from the compulsion to do whatever our compulsion is.

    Here is a short review of how the process is laid out in the unchanged
    original 164 pages of the book Alcoholics Anonymous or the “Big Book”.
    I find it interesting that many, many other works, to include the "Universal
    12 Step Program" by Dr.s Peiser and Sandry, use the same ideas of internal
    cleansing, even when the idea of God is replaced by "Rational Thinking" or
    "Reality". The basis of "How to Manage your DICK (Destructive Impulses with
    Cyber Kinetics)" by Dr. Sean O'Reilly is to find a set of beliefs to confront
    your "Lizard" brain with. Again, replacing my "Will" with a belief in something
    outside myself. I often use "Good Orderly Direction" (Picked up from a Jew
    addressing the troubles people from non-traditional spiritual beliefs have with
    working the 12 Steps) or “Group of Deviants”.

    As I read the preamble to the 12 Steps, there are three pertinent ideas in the
    "Program of Recovery":

    a. A need to "completely give themselves to this simple program” or “become
    willing to go to any lengths."
    b. Get honest (with ourselves and others, but not necessarily those who you
    could hurt with your honesty).
    c. Let go of our old ideas.

    They are then followed with the "suggested program" of basically finding
    something outside myself to trust, cleaning my house or "soul" of any harms
    I have done and forgiving those who I believe have harmed me. And that by
    doing this, the "need" for my DOC will be cleansed from me. And then I
    maintain my newly cleaned "soul" by practicing daily the act of watching to
    give no offense and living free of resentments by forgiving others. I also
    need to let go of any and all fears, believing that my "God" or HP will
    provide for me. I think it is this last part, the letting go of fear, and
    trusting "God" to meet our needs that causes so much trouble for so many of
    us. Once again I refer to the "Big Book",

    "Many of us exclaimed, "What an order! I can't go through with it."
    Do not be discouraged. No one among us has been able to maintain anything
    like perfect adherence to these principals. We are not saints. The point is,
    we are willing to grow along spiritual lines. The principals we have set
    down here are guides to spiritual progress. We claim spiritual progress, not
    perfection."

    Because if it had come from me, I would not be in a place where I believed my
    life was out of control.

    Letting go of my old ideas - I can control my compulsive behaviors doing
    what I have done in the past. Duh, it didn't work before, maybe I need to try
    something different.

    1. We admitted that we were powerless over (sex, love, lust) -- that our lives
    had become unmanageable.

    Step one to me is a given, else I would not have sought help.

    2. Came to believe that a Power greater than ourselves could restore us to sanity.
    My "will" says act out, even though another part of me knows that it will
    hurt, albeit it a different kind of hurt then the one I was trying to kill
    my DOC. So I am asked to turn over that part of me, my will and thus my life,
    to "God". But what or who is "God"? Some claim to know the answer.... the
    AA Big Book says you must find your own. But if you don't fined one bigger
    then your disease, you won't have anything to turn to that you can trust when
    the desire to act out is overpowering. Most find that the “God” they came into
    the program with has to be replaced with a new “God”, simply because that “God”
    wasn't able to help stop the acting out. Once you have that “God” or "Good
    Orderly Direction" in your life, then you can move forward.

    3. Made a decision to turn our will and our lives over to the care of God as we
    understood Him.

    4. Made a searching and fearless moral inventory of ourselves.

    How to do this has many different models. Many use Dr. Pat Carnes “Gentle Path
    Through the 12 Steps”. Some use the “Joe and Charley Step Study” Many simply use
    the AA Big Book” it's self. The AA Big Book process can be a little confusing
    (though the intent was to have a simple example the common business person would
    understand) but the idea is to list who or what bothers you (resentments and
    fears), the exact idea you have about the cause, and what part of me is bothered
    or pained; our self-esteem, our pocketbooks, our ambitions or our relationships.
    Then we finely list what are our defects of “character”, selfishness, dishonesty,
    and inconsideration.

    5. Admitted to God, to ourselves, and to another human being the exact nature of
    our wrongs.

    As the AA fellowship grew, the “another human being” came to be understood as
    one's “Sponsor” (in the early days of AA, you had to be “Sponsored” into one of
    the “Anonymous” meetings). When the Big Book was written, there where less then
    100 members, scattered around the country.

    6. Were entirely ready to have God remove all these defects of character.

    Here again, this “God” has to be one you want to trust.

    7. Humbly asked Him to remove our shortcomings.

    Those we identified in our inventory.

    8. Made a list of all persons we had harmed, and became willing to make amends
    to them all.

    Often the same people listed on the inventory.

    9. Made direct amends to such people wherever possible, except when to do so
    would injure them or others.

    This too is where the help of a Sponsor is considered indispensable, so it does
    not become a “Guilt Dump” or give more hurt then help.

    10. Continued to take personal inventory and when we were wrong, promptly
    admitted it.

    Keeping our house clean by daily looking at where we have been resentful
    selfish, dishonest or afraid? “Have we kept something to ourselves which should
    be discussed with another person at once?”

    11. Sought through prayer and meditation to improve our conscious contact with
    God as we understood Him, praying only for knowledge of His will for us and the
    power to carry that out.

    12. Having had a spiritual awakening as the result of these Steps, we tried to
    carry this message to others, and to practice these principles in all our
    affairs. We stay sober by helping others, thus remembering when our lives were
    unmanageable.

    Categories: , , , ,


    ==========
    This article is for informational purposes only.
    Please contact a licensed professional in your area
    if you are in crisis or require mental health services

    Wednesday, August 23, 2006

    Hubris Part Duex

    Hubris

    On one of my other blogs, I put up the Wikopedia definition:
    exaggerated pride or self-confidence, often resulting in fatal retribution.

    The Nazi's had Hubris:
    They thought the Brits were going to join them... You know the British Empire?

    Henry Ford had Hubris: He bought a huge plantation in South America to plant rubber trees... Ford had his managers plant rubber trees just like they ran the mass production car factory- only problem was that rubber trees, in thier natural habitat, are highly susceptible to blight- ergo you only find rubber trees surviving not in clusters, but far apart from each other.

    Your Ego thinks it IS you...& your Ego is Hubris Central

    And, the smarter you are, the more difficult detachment and surrender is.

    Technorati Tags
  • Detachment

  • Hubris

  • Self-Confidence

  • Ego



  • This article is for informational purposes only.
    Please contact a licensed professional in your area
    if you are in crisis or require mental health services

    Saturday, August 19, 2006

    Self Sabotage for codependents

    Self Sabotage for codependents...

    The clinical term for this is:
    bland
    boring
    stark

    by that I mean the clinical description, while definitive... doesn't give the person suffering from this behavior much inclination as to what the "F" to do about it.

    ... drum roll
    the term is:
    Pyschological Reversal


    more later

  • Psychological Reversal

  • Self Sabotage





  • This article is for informational purposes only.
    Please contact a licensed professional in your area
    if you are in crisis or require mental health services

    Sunday, August 13, 2006

    If a tree falls in a forest & no one is around...

    Got this gem while googling, it's from a neat blog titled:

    "My Secret Underground Society"

    ====================

    If A Tree Falls In A Forest, And No One Is Around To Hear It...

    Does it make a sound? I came across this long-debated question again while I reading a website. Then I googled it to see how people answered it.

    I always thought this was more of a scientific question than philosophical, but from the answers I read, it's a question of "What is Reality?" Here's how I answer it (as brief as possible): No, it doesn't make a sound. It produces sound waves, but unless you have the ability to translate the waves into sensory information in the brain, then there is no sound. If a deaf person is in the woods and a tree falls beside him, it doesn't make a "sound."

    I found a lot of interesting answers on the web. These are some excerpts. Some are very long and detailed answers.
    ====================

    The comment I added to this post:

    I agree with KarmaKity, I'm told that dogs cannot see colors. The sky doesn't really HAVE a color, not inherently anyway...

    We only percieve light refracting off of the prism effect created by our atmosphere.

    SOooo, we see that frequency as blue, but, and this is a big but: the sky isn't *really* blue (not to itself or any non human)

    What does light/ color have to do with the damn tree sound?

    Perception

    So if a tree falls in the forest and no one is there to hear it, the damn tree hitting the ground displaces air molecules... if you want to call them sounds... that's up to you


    The trackback url for my comment in reply to that post is:

    http://tsscusb.blog-city.com/read/trackback/311697015.htm

    Oh, and I'm adding this disclaimer to all my posts from now on:

    This article is for informational purposes only.
    Please contact a licensed professional in your area
    if you are in crisis or require mental health services

    I'm not an L.C.S.W, but I did stay at a Holiday Express last night:)

    Friday, August 11, 2006

    A comparison of victim and martyr characteristics

    Victim:
    1. Usually has short-term problem
    ------Martyr:
    Long-term problem

    Victim:
    2. Motivated to change
    ------Martyr:
    Stuck in their problem

    Victim:
    3. Rights violated by others
    ------Martyr:
    Rights violated by others

    Victim:
    4. Did not choose the problem
    ------Martyr:
    Chooses to remain in problem situation

    Victim:
    5. Never complains
    ------Martyr:
    Complains all the time

    Victim:
    6. Lacks insight into problem
    ------Martyr::
    Frequently has insight into the problem

    Victim:
    7. Unknowingly plays an active part in the problem
    ------Martyr:
    Frequently knowingly plays an active part in the problem

    Victim:
    8. Doesn't often seek help
    ------Martyr:
    Seeks help all the time

    Victim:
    9. Wants to ``let go'' of problem
    ------Martyr:
    ``Holds on to'' the problem

    Victim:
    10. Guilt free
    ------Martyr:
    Guilt driven

    Victim:
    11. Solution oriented
    ------Martyr:
    Problem oriented

    Victim:
    12. Powerless due to lack of knowledge
    ------Martyr:
    Powerless out of a free will choice to be so

    this list was from http://www.coping.org/relations/martyr.htm#difference

    Thursday, August 10, 2006

    Rational Mind limitations

    From the study of N.L.P. (Neuro Lingustic Programing), which is the study of subjective experience, we know that all you can hold in your head is 7 +/- bits of information.

    Nine *chunks* simultaneously that is.

    John Bradshaw says that what he calls our Ego consciousness is what is being defined there.

    He goes on to discuss the possibility that we are much more than an Ego.

    Consciousness is much more than what Ego can handle.

    Consciousness is great, it's good to have... but there is much more
    there are more than just the 5 senses.

    The problem with Ego consciousness is if I 'chunk' on you I'm not conscious of me.

    Ego is about predictability.
    With out Ego, we'd be like "Rain Man", the character Dustin Hoffman played.

    We're used to the predictable rythms of the universe.
    This "Ego Structure" is our predictability structure.

    What if the sun didn't come up for 2 weeks...
    we'd start getting scared... "this is wierd, you know the sun hasn't come up... call channel 7..."

    Codependents get stuck in ego predictability:
    "She's been bitching and nagging at him to come home early.
    She's been doing it for 16 years...
    and hasn't caught on YET that it doesn't work"
    more later

    How To Spot A Codependent

    OR how to discover that you're codependent, a checklist A) codependents want chronic maladies, they want to have to "treat" ...